Rumsfeld" U. YES: U. They further argue that the President does not have any inherent authority either to engage in warrantless wiretapping or to violate federal law that limits such surveillance. Entertainment Merchants Association" U.
|Published (Last):||24 April 2009|
|PDF File Size:||4.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Pricing subject to change at any time. The estimated amount of time this product will be on the market is based on a number of factors, including faculty input to instructional design and the prior revision cycle and updates to academic research-which typically results in a revision cycle ranging from every two to four years for this product. Yes: U. They further argue that the President does not have any inherent authority either to engage in warrantless wiretapping or to violate federal law that limits such surveillance.
Justice Stephen Breyer believes that the California law restricting the purchase of video games by minors is clear and constitutional. Yes: William H. Rehnquist, from "Majority Opinion, Washington v.
Rehnquist, writing one of six opinions of a unanimous Court in Washington v. Judge Stephen Reinhardt, writing the majority opinion for the Ninth Circuit case that became Washington v. Glucksberg when it reached the U. Supreme Court, argues that criminalizing physician assistance in hastening the death of competent, terminally ill patients who request life-ending prescriptions violates the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.
Grokster, Ltd. Justice Stephen Breyer does not want copyright laws to hinder technological innovation and is more willing to take into account the potential use of the software for lawful file sharing.
Plata," United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy rules that if a prison deprives prisoners of basic sustenance, including adequate medical care, the courts have a responsibility to remedy the resulting violation of the Eighth Amendment.
Justice Antonin Scalia believes that a ruling that may result in the release of 40, prisoners is unwarranted and unprecedented. Roberts, Jr. Chief Justice John G. Susan Galloway," United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the Majority, affirms the right of local government bodies to hold a prayer prior to conducting official business maintaining that the history of the United States is consistent with such a practice, and thus the Establishment Clause is not implicated.
April Redding," United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Justice David Souter holds that a search in school requires a reasonable belief that evidence of wrongdoing will be found and that the search is not excessively intrusive in light of the age and sex of the student. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas argues that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when there is reasonable suspicion that the student is in possession of drugs banned by school policy and the search is in an area where small pills could be concealed.
Jardines," United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia finds that it is a search and a violation of the Fourth Amendment when police obtain evidence by allowing a trained dog to physically enter and occupy an area outside a home in which permission has not been obtained from the home owner.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito disagrees that there was a trespass here or that the dog sniff could be considered an invasion of any reasonable expectation of privacy given that one can expect that odors will float outside of a house.
Christopher Simmons," United States Supreme Court Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy holds that the Constitution prohibits the execution of a person who was under the age of 18 at the time of the offense. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia believes that the Constitution does not preclude the execution of a juvenile.
Yes: John G. Miller, held that the Second Amendment did not protect the right of a private citizen to own a handgun for self-defense. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas disagrees with part of the statute being held unconstitutional, arguing that the history and nature of cross burning in the United States inextricably links the act to threatening and menacing violence and that the intent to intimidate can therefore be inferred solely from the act of cross burning itself.
Roberts, Jr, from "Dissenting Opinion, Obergefell v. Justice Samuel Alito argues that the university failed to effectively demonstrate that its admission policy needs a racial element and that the one it employs does, in fact, foster diversity.
Justice Antonin Scalia argues that it is not unconstitutional for a state to supplement U.
Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Legal Issues
Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Legal Issues 16th Edition Free PDF